Vmware vs virtualbox headless mac os#
Vmware vs virtualbox headless driver#
Vmware vs virtualbox headless free#

After the VirtualBox VM Additions were in place within the host OS, the new feature’s menu option became available in the VirtualBox console window. The default VirtualBox UI is clean and uncluttered, with most controls and functions easily accessible, and the “seamless windows” feature was remarkably easy to use. As with previous versions, though, I did encounter the occasional IP address conflict message from both the host (Vista) and guest (Windows XP). After this bridge was in place I could browse my local network from the guest OS and access resources on the host OS.

Vmware vs virtualbox headless driver#

The only caveat was the need to manually configure bridged networking support - a process that involved creating a network bridge between the VirtualBox TAP adapter driver and the local NIC driver on the host. I tested VirtualBox 1.5.2 on both Windows Vista Ultimate 圆4 and Ubuntu 7.10 “Gutsy Gibbon.” As with previous versions, installation was straightforward. Combined with VirtualBox’s support for headless operation (via the vboxsrvr process), this support allows innotek to position VirtualBox as a direct competitor to VMware Server and Microsoft Virtual Server in the server consolidation and desktop virtualization space. For example, innotek now claims the capability to support many more concurrent virtual machines - up to 96 instances of Windows XP on a dual-socket server with 32GB of RAM. Other areas of improvement are mostly under the hood.

Vmware vs virtualbox headless free#

And though it’s not as well integrated with the Linux host as Parallels is with OS X (for example, you can’t create shortcuts or file associations between the host and guest), it’s free and integrates well with leading desktop distributions such as Ubuntu. The latter should be of special interest to Windows defectors who have been looking for a reason to go the Linux route versus Apple. The VirtualBox implementation, however, represents the first time the capability has been available under Windows or Linux. Basically, it’s a knock-off of the Coherence feature of Parallels Desktop for the Mac. With version 1.5.0, VirtualBox introduced a major new capability: seamless windows. VirtualBox is available free for noncommercial use, and there’s even a GNU-licensed version for those who might want to tinker with the source code. It maintains a consistent user interface across all of its host implementations, making it popular with users who multiboot between Windows, Linux, and/or OS X.

Vmware vs virtualbox headless mac os#

It supports Windows (both 32- and 64-bit versions), Mac OS X, and various Linux distributions as hosts while providing a VMware-like laundry list of supported guest OSes. Since then, the company has retooled VirtualBox, improving performance and reliability while also adding some compelling new features found nowhere else.įirst, the particulars: VirtualBox is a cross-platform virtual machine management solution. What a difference a year makes! When I first reviewed innotek’s VirtualBox, in version 1.3, I found a product with tremendous potential marred by some annoying stability and performance issues.